Review



human cd200fc  (R&D Systems)


Bioz Verified Symbol R&D Systems is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol R&D Systems manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    R&D Systems human cd200fc
    Human Cd200fc, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 6 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human cd200fc/product/R&D Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 6 article reviews
    human cd200fc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    93/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    93
    R&D Systems human cd200fc
    Human Cd200fc, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human cd200fc/product/R&D Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human cd200fc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    R&D Systems recombinant human cd200fc protein
    Figure 4. Evaluation of CD200R1 functions with CD200R1 knockdown and <t>CD200Fc</t> administration. (a) Western blots in the left part showing the representing protein levels after CD200R1 knockdown with siRNA in PC9 and H358 cells, respectively. Bar graphs on the right part show western blotting quantification of pAKT/AKT and pERK/ERK in the siRNA1 and siRNA2 groups relative to those in negative controls (NCs). The data represent the mean ± SD, N = 4. *P <.05 and **P <.001 vs. NC (one-way ANOVA). (b–c) Effect of CD200R1 knockdown with siRNA on cell proliferation in PC9 and H358 cells as analyzed by CCK-8 assays. The negative control (NC) was scramble RNA-transfected cells. The data represent the mean ± SD, N = 5. *P <.05 and **P <.001 vs. NC (one-way ANOVA). (d) Effect of CD200Fc treatment on cell proliferation in PC9 cells as analyzed by CCK-8 assays. (e) Effect of CD200Fc treatment on endogenous mRNA expression levels of immune markers in PC9 cells as analyzed by RT-qPCR. Gene expression was normalized to the expression of GAPDH and is shown relative to vehicle control expression. The data represent the mean ± SD, N = 3. *P <.05 and **P <.001 vs. vehicle (Student’s t-test).
    Recombinant Human Cd200fc Protein, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/recombinant human cd200fc protein/product/R&D Systems
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    recombinant human cd200fc protein - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Figure 4. Evaluation of CD200R1 functions with CD200R1 knockdown and CD200Fc administration. (a) Western blots in the left part showing the representing protein levels after CD200R1 knockdown with siRNA in PC9 and H358 cells, respectively. Bar graphs on the right part show western blotting quantification of pAKT/AKT and pERK/ERK in the siRNA1 and siRNA2 groups relative to those in negative controls (NCs). The data represent the mean ± SD, N = 4. *P <.05 and **P <.001 vs. NC (one-way ANOVA). (b–c) Effect of CD200R1 knockdown with siRNA on cell proliferation in PC9 and H358 cells as analyzed by CCK-8 assays. The negative control (NC) was scramble RNA-transfected cells. The data represent the mean ± SD, N = 5. *P <.05 and **P <.001 vs. NC (one-way ANOVA). (d) Effect of CD200Fc treatment on cell proliferation in PC9 cells as analyzed by CCK-8 assays. (e) Effect of CD200Fc treatment on endogenous mRNA expression levels of immune markers in PC9 cells as analyzed by RT-qPCR. Gene expression was normalized to the expression of GAPDH and is shown relative to vehicle control expression. The data represent the mean ± SD, N = 3. *P <.05 and **P <.001 vs. vehicle (Student’s t-test).

    Journal: OncoImmunology

    Article Title: CD200 and CD200R1 are differentially expressed and have differential prognostic roles in non-small cell lung cancer

    doi: 10.1080/2162402x.2020.1746554

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 4. Evaluation of CD200R1 functions with CD200R1 knockdown and CD200Fc administration. (a) Western blots in the left part showing the representing protein levels after CD200R1 knockdown with siRNA in PC9 and H358 cells, respectively. Bar graphs on the right part show western blotting quantification of pAKT/AKT and pERK/ERK in the siRNA1 and siRNA2 groups relative to those in negative controls (NCs). The data represent the mean ± SD, N = 4. *P <.05 and **P <.001 vs. NC (one-way ANOVA). (b–c) Effect of CD200R1 knockdown with siRNA on cell proliferation in PC9 and H358 cells as analyzed by CCK-8 assays. The negative control (NC) was scramble RNA-transfected cells. The data represent the mean ± SD, N = 5. *P <.05 and **P <.001 vs. NC (one-way ANOVA). (d) Effect of CD200Fc treatment on cell proliferation in PC9 cells as analyzed by CCK-8 assays. (e) Effect of CD200Fc treatment on endogenous mRNA expression levels of immune markers in PC9 cells as analyzed by RT-qPCR. Gene expression was normalized to the expression of GAPDH and is shown relative to vehicle control expression. The data represent the mean ± SD, N = 3. *P <.05 and **P <.001 vs. vehicle (Student’s t-test).

    Article Snippet: To investigate the binding of CD200 to CD200R1, we used recombinant human CD200Fc protein (cat no. 2724-CD; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA).

    Techniques: Knockdown, Western Blot, CCK-8 Assay, Negative Control, Transfection, Expressing, Quantitative RT-PCR, Gene Expression, Control

    Figure 5. Enriched gene profiles in tumors with high CD200R1 expression and differentially-expressed genes in response to CD200Fc administration as assessed by cDNA microarray. (a) Volcano plots showing the significantly overexpressed genes among tumors with high CD200R1 expression using online RNA sequencing data (NSCLC, TCGA, Provisional) including 230 adenocarcinomas (ADCs), and 501 squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). The overexpressed genes in high CD200R1-expressing tumors are surrounded by dashed lines in the volcano plots, and these were additionally analyzed based on GSEA Investigation gene set analysis using the hallmark gene set. (b) Log2 fold expression changes of the 35 most strongly up- and downregulated genes in PC9 cells treated with CD200Fc versus expression in cells treated with vehicle (N = 2). (c) GSEA analysis comparing up- and downregulated cancer hallmark gene sets and oncogenic signature gene sets in PC9 cells treated with CD200Fc versus expression in cells treated with vehicle. (d–e) Expression of certain genes differentially-expressed upon CD200Fc administration in PC9 cells based on validation by RT-qPCR. Gene expression was normalized to the expression of GAPDH and is shown relative to the vehicle-treated control expression. The data represent the mean ± SD, N = 3. *P <.05 and **P <.001 vs. vehicle (Student’s t-test).

    Journal: OncoImmunology

    Article Title: CD200 and CD200R1 are differentially expressed and have differential prognostic roles in non-small cell lung cancer

    doi: 10.1080/2162402x.2020.1746554

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 5. Enriched gene profiles in tumors with high CD200R1 expression and differentially-expressed genes in response to CD200Fc administration as assessed by cDNA microarray. (a) Volcano plots showing the significantly overexpressed genes among tumors with high CD200R1 expression using online RNA sequencing data (NSCLC, TCGA, Provisional) including 230 adenocarcinomas (ADCs), and 501 squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). The overexpressed genes in high CD200R1-expressing tumors are surrounded by dashed lines in the volcano plots, and these were additionally analyzed based on GSEA Investigation gene set analysis using the hallmark gene set. (b) Log2 fold expression changes of the 35 most strongly up- and downregulated genes in PC9 cells treated with CD200Fc versus expression in cells treated with vehicle (N = 2). (c) GSEA analysis comparing up- and downregulated cancer hallmark gene sets and oncogenic signature gene sets in PC9 cells treated with CD200Fc versus expression in cells treated with vehicle. (d–e) Expression of certain genes differentially-expressed upon CD200Fc administration in PC9 cells based on validation by RT-qPCR. Gene expression was normalized to the expression of GAPDH and is shown relative to the vehicle-treated control expression. The data represent the mean ± SD, N = 3. *P <.05 and **P <.001 vs. vehicle (Student’s t-test).

    Article Snippet: To investigate the binding of CD200 to CD200R1, we used recombinant human CD200Fc protein (cat no. 2724-CD; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA).

    Techniques: Expressing, Microarray, RNA Sequencing, Biomarker Discovery, Quantitative RT-PCR, Gene Expression, Control